Then over the weekend, I spoke at CapitolJS, talking about ES6 and Dart, and demo’ing RiverTrail to the JS faithful. As usual, I’ll narrate my slides, but look out for something new at the end: a screencast showing the RiverTrail IDF demo.
I had a lot to cover in a half-hour (a good talk-time in my view — we’ll see how the video comes out, but I found it invigorating). CapitolJS had a higher-than-JSConf level of newcomers to JS in attendance, so I ran through material that should be familiar to readers of this blog, presented here without much commentary:
The meaning of my color-coding should be intuitively obvious ;-).
BTW, dom.js, with its Proxy usage under the hood, is going great, with David Flanagan and Donovan Preston among others hacking away on it, and (this is important) providing feedback to WebIDL‘s editor, Cameron McCormack.
Here I must add the usual caveat that “ES6” might be renumbered. Were I more prudent, I’d call it “ES.next”, but it’s highly likely to be the 6th edition, and you’re all sophisticated close readers of the spec and its colorful history, right?
@ notation is actually “out” for ES6, per the July meeting (see notes). Thanks to private name objects and object literal extensions (see middle column), private access syntax is factored out of classes. Just use
p[x], or (in an object literal for the computed property name, which need not be a private name)
As close to CoffeeScript as I can get them, given JS’s grammar and curly-brace (not indentation-based) block structure.
Ruby-esque, Smalltalk is the grandfather.
You know you want it.
@mikeal is right that JS syntax is not a problem for some (perhaps many) users. For others, it’s a hardship. Adding block-lambdas helps that cohort, adds value for code generators (see Harmony Goals above), and on balance improves the language in my view. It won my straw show-of-hands poll at CapitolJS against all of arrows, vaguer alternatives, and doing nothing.
The epic Hacker News thread on my last blog post in relation to Dart needs its own Baedeker. For now I’ll just note that Dart and the politics evident in the memo are not making some of my standards pals who work for other browser vendors happy. Google may fancy itself the new Netscape, but it doesn’t have the market share to pull off proprietary power-move de facto standards.
The leaked memo makes some observations I agree with, some unbacked assertions about unfixable JS problems that TC39 work in progress may falsify this year, and a few implicit arguments that are just silly on their face.
Still, I think we should react to valid complaints about JS, whatever the source. The
number type has well-known usability and (in practice, in spite of aggressively optimizing JIT-compiling VMs) performance problems.
The last bullet shows pragmas for switching default numeric type and arithmetic evaluation regime. This would have to affect
Math, but lexically — no dynamic scope. Still a bit hairy, and not yet on the boards for Harmony. But perhaps it ought to be.
Coordinated strawman prototyping in SpiderMonkey and V8 is a tall order. Perhaps we need a separate jswg.org, as whatwg.org is to the w3c, to run ahead? I’ve been told I should be BDFL of such an org. Would this work? Comments welcome.
Remember, ridiculously parallel processing power is coming, if not already present, on your portable devices. It’s here on your laptops and desktops. The good news is that JS can exploit it without your having to deal with data races and deadlocks.
RiverTrail is a Narcissus-based JS to OpenCL compiler, packaged as a Firefox add-on. It demonstrates the utility of a new
ParallelArray built-in, based on typed arrays. The JS-to-OpenCL compiler automatically multicore-short-vectorizes your JS for you.
As noted in the previous slide, because the
ParallelArray methods compile to parallelized folds (see Guy Steele’s excellent ICFP 2009 keynote), associative operations will be reordered, resulting in small non-deterministic floating point imprecision errors. This won’t matter for graphics code in general, and it’s an inevitable cost of business using parallel floating point hardware.
The code looks like typical JS, with no hairy callbacks, workers, or threads. It requires thinking in terms of immutable trees and reductions or other folds, but that is not a huge burden. As Guy’s talk makes plain, learning to program this way is the key to parallel speedups.
Here is my screencast of the demo. Alas, since RiverTrail currently targets the CPU and its short vector unit (SSE4), and my screencast software uses the same parallel hardware, the frame rate is not what it should be. But not to worry, we’re working on GPU targeting too.
At CapitolJS and without ScreenFlow running, I saw frame rates above 35 for the Parallel demo, compared to 3 or 2 for Sequential.
The point of a technology demonstrator is to show where real JS engines can go. Automatic parallelization of
ParallelArray-based code can be done by next year’s JS engines, based on this year’s Firefox add-on. We’re very close to exploiting massively parallel hardware from JS, without having to write WebCL and risk terrible safety and DoS bugs.
To close, I sought inspiration from Wesley Snipes in Passenger 57. Ok, not his best movie, but I miss the ’90s action movie era.
Seriously, the shortest path on the Web usually is the winning play. JS is demonstrably able to grow new capabilities with less effort than a “replacement” entails. Always bet on JS!